The
links between clustered system pairs that perform remote mirroring must meet specific
configuration, latency, and distance requirements.
Redundant fabrics shows an example of a
configuration that uses dual redundant fabrics that can be configured
for Fibre Channel connections. Part of each fabric is located at the
local system and the remote system. There is no direct connection
between the two fabrics.
Figure 1. Redundant fabrics
You can use Fibre Channel extenders
or SAN routers to increase the distance between two systems. Fibre Channel extenders transmit Fibre Channel packets across long links without changing the contents of the packets.
SAN routers provide virtual N_ports on two or more SANs to extend
the scope of the SAN. The SAN router distributes the traffic from
one virtual N_port to the other virtual N_port. The two Fibre
Channel fabrics are independent of each other. Therefore,
N_ports on each of the fabrics cannot directly log in to each other.
See the following Web sites for specific firmware levels and the latest
supported hardware:
If you use Fibre Channel extenders or SAN
routers, you must meet the following requirements:
- The maximum supported round-trip latency between sites depends
on the type of partnership between systems, the version of software,
and the system hardware that is used. Maximum supported round-trip latency between sites lists the maximum round-trip latency. This
restriction applies to all variant of remote mirroring. More configuration
requirements and guidelines apply to systems that perform remote mirroring
over extended distances, where the round-trip time is greater than
80 ms.
Table 1. Maximum supported round-trip latency between sites
Software version |
System node hardware |
Partnership |
FC |
1 Gbps IP |
10 Gbps IP |
7.3.0 and earlier |
All |
80 ms |
80 ms |
10 ms |
7.4.0 and later |
|
250 ms |
All other models |
80 ms |
- The round-trip latency between sites cannot
exceed 80 ms for either Fibre Channel extenders
or SAN routers. This maximum round-trip latency applies to all variants
of remote mirroring, including Global Mirror with change volumes and
IP partnership.
- Metro Mirror and Global Mirror require 2.6 Mbps of bandwidth for intersystem heartbeat traffic.
- If the link between two sites is configured with redundancy so
that it can tolerate single failures, the link must be sized so that
the bandwidth and latency statements are correct during single failure
conditions.
- The configuration is tested to confirm that any failover mechanisms
in the intersystem links interoperate satisfactorily withthe systems.
- All other configuration requirements are met.
Configuration requirements for systems that perform
remote mirroring over extended distances (greater than 80 ms round-trip
latency between sites)
If you use remote mirroring between
systems with 80 - 250 ms round-trip latency, you must meet the following
additional requirements:
In addition to the preceding list of requirements, the following
guidelines are provided for optimizing performance for remote mirroring
by using Global Mirror:
- Partnered systems should use the same number of nodes in each
system for replication.
- For maximum throughput, all nodes in each system should be used
for replication, both in terms of balancing the preferred node assignment
for volumes and for providing intersystem Fibre Channel connectivity.
- Onthe system, provisioning dedicated node ports for local
node-to-node traffic (by using port masking) isolates Global Mirror
node-to-node traffic between the local nodes from other local SAN
traffic. As a result, optimal response times can be achieved. This
configuration of local node port masking is less of a requirement
on Storwize family systems, where traffic between node canisters in
an I/O group is serviced by the dedicated inter-canister link in the
enclosure.
- Where possible, use the minimum number of partnerships between
systems. For example, assume site A contains systems A1 and A2, and
site B contains systems B1 and B2. In this scenario, creating separate
partnerships between pairs of systems (such as A1-B1 and A2-B2) offers
greater performance for Global Mirror replication between sites than
a configuration with partnerships that are defined between all four
systems.
Limitations on host-to-system distances
There is no limit on the Fibre Channel optical
distance betweenthe system nodes and host servers. You can attach a
server to an edge switch in a core-edge configuration with thesystem at the core.The system can support up to three ISL hops in the fabric.
Therefore, the host server and thesystem can be separated by up to five Fibre
Channel links. If you use longwave small form-factor pluggable (SFP) transceivers, four of the Fibre Channel links can be
up to 10 km long.